Ciso Cockpit

Product detail

Available

Vulnerability Risk Management

Prioritize vulnerability risk and keep the remediation system under statistical control.

A centralized Vulnerability Risk Management platform built around two complementary engines: SSVC for risk- and context-based prioritization, and VRCM™ for statistical control of backlog aging, aged-exposure persistence, and remediation clearance capacity. Supported findings are aggregated and normalized with source-level idempotent deduplication, then handled through unified remediation tracking and reporting.

Built around

01SSVC decision-oriented prioritization
02VRCM backlog and exposure control
03Centralized remediation handling
04Unified risk and performance reporting
Proof points
SSVC
Prioritization engine
VRCM
Statistical control engine
Centralized remediation tracking
Handling
Security and engineering teams
Built for

How the exposure workflow runs

Findings flow from sources through prioritization to remediation and closure. Every step is tracked, owned, and auditable.

01

Ingest supported sources

Plugin-based connectors bring in findings from represented vulnerability, cloud security, SCA, container, and workflow systems.

02

Normalize and preserve source identity

Findings are normalized for centralized handling with idempotent deduplication within each source.

03

Prioritize with SSVC

Findings are evaluated against exploitation status, automatable exposure, mission impact, and asset context. The output is an operational decision—not just a number.

04

Assign and route

Findings are routed to owners based on asset tags, business service mapping, and team responsibilities. Ownership is explicit, not assumed.

05

Control with VRCM

Monitor backlog aging, aged-exposure persistence, remediation clearance capacity, and remediation performance statistically.

06

Validate, report, and improve

Track closure evidence and report unified priorities, trends, exposure, and remediation performance.

Full module capabilities

From scanner noise to one exposure queue with evidence behind each decision.

The module connects supported source ingestion, operational prioritization, remediation control, validation, and reporting while preserving source identity.

01

Multi-source aggregation

Qualys, CrowdStrike, Tenable, Rapid7, Snyk, Microsoft Defender
AWS Security Hub, Azure Policy, GCP SCC
Mend.io, Dependency-Track, Red Hat ACS
Represented plugin sources from the collectors layer
Multi-source aggregation
Act: 3Attend: 3
SourceDecisionFindingAssets
QualysActOracle Java SE Critical Deserialization RCE64
CrowdStrikeActMicrosoft Edge Chromium V8 Type Confusion47
SnykActApache Log4j 1.2 Remote Code Execution24
TenableAttendOracle Java SE April Critical Patch Update59
DefenderAttendOpenSSL Buffer Overflow in X.509 Verification31
AWS HubAttendcurl HSTS Bypass via IDN Hostname Mismatch18
02

SSVC prioritization

Actionable decisioning instead of score-only ranking
Exploitation status and automatable exposure
Mission impact and asset criticality context
Operational decisions rather than CVSS-only triage
03

VRCM statistical control

Backlog aging and aged-exposure persistence
Remediation clearance capacity
Control-window trend monitoring
Statistical control of remediation performance
04

Remediation operations

Ownership assignment and routing
Remediation tracking and target dates
Jira workflow integration
Validation queue and closure proof
Remediation Pipeline
4 active1 overdue
JIRA-4521
Patch Java Runtime across prodPlatform
3d left
JIRA-4518
Fix Log4j dependency chainAppSec
Closed
JIRA-4515
Rotate exposed API keysIAM Team
Overdue
JIRA-4512
TLS 1.0 deprecation rolloutNetwork
7d left
JIRA-4509
S3 bucket public exposureCloud Team
12d left
SLA compliance80% on time

Integrations: plugin-based, not locked in

The platform connects to the represented tools you already run through the collectors layer, so teams can centralize handling without replacing every source system.

01

Vulnerability scanners

Qualys VMDR, CrowdStrike Falcon, Tenable.io, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint.

02

Application security

Snyk (Code + Container), Mend.io (SCA), Dependency-Track (SBOM + SCA), Red Hat ACS (StackRox).

03

Cloud security

AWS Security Hub, Azure Policy, GCP Security Command Center. Multi-cloud posture findings in one queue.

04

Workflow and SOC

Jira for workflow and Splunk for SOC telemetry, represented through the plugin integrations layer.

How prioritization works in practice

The platform does not stop at scanner severity. It evaluates exploitability, exposure, business impact, and operational context so teams can decide what actually needs action now.

01

From severity to action

The output is an operational decision, not just a score. Teams can separate items that need immediate action from issues that should be scheduled, watched, or left in the background queue.

Considers exploitation status in the wild
Weighs automatable exposure and mission impact
Reflects asset criticality and exposure context
Replaces subjective severity debates with structured decisions
02

What the model actually considers

A high-severity issue on an isolated test host is not the same as a lower-rated issue on a critical internet-facing service. Prioritization reflects where the asset sits, how exposed it is, and whether the weakness is realistically actionable by an attacker.

Asset criticality and business impact
Internet-facing vs internal-only exposure
Active exploitation vs theoretical risk
Automatable attack chains vs manual exploitation

Built for the full remediation chain

Designed for real operating roles, not generic personas.

Security teams

Centralize supported findings, use SSVC for contextual decisions, and operate remediation from one prioritized handling flow.

Engineering and platform teams

Work from a clear response queue with ownership, deadlines, and validation. Know exactly what to fix, in what order, and prove it was done.

CISOs and executive stakeholders

See backlog aging, risk exposure, remediation capacity, and performance trends in one reporting view.

Platform fit

See how Vulnerability Risk Management fits inside the wider platform.

The product stands on its own, but it becomes more valuable when it connects to governance, trust, audit readiness, and operational security in the same system.