Compliance does not prove security
You can pass an audit and still have critical vulnerabilities, weak identity controls, or failing operational processes.
One connected platform where technical posture, quantified risk, governance decisions, and trust outcomes live in one system—not six.
The problem
You can pass an audit and still have critical vulnerabilities, weak identity controls, or failing operational processes.
Security tools rarely show how findings affect readiness, evidence, and regulatory obligations.
Leadership reconciles separate dashboards for posture, remediation, audits, controls, and risk.
Teams rebuild proof from screenshots, documents, and spreadsheets that already exist in operations.
The operating chain
The same activity moves from signal collection into risk, controls, evidence, compliance, and outward trust—without teams rebuilding the story downstream.
Five connected operating pillars
Get a clear overview of the platform, then explore each product area for detailed workflows, evidence, and technical capabilities.
A centralized platform that aggregates and normalizes findings from multiple sources, applies source-level idempotent deduplication, centralizes handling and remediation tracking, and provides unified reporting on posture, priorities, trends, and performance.
See full capabilityRisk- and context-based vulnerability prioritization: what should be handled first, and why.
Statistical control of backlog aging, aged-exposure persistence, and remediation clearance capacity.
Assets, external attack surface, cloud, Kubernetes, IAM, and hardening stay connected to operational and governance outcomes.
See moreFAIR-informed scenarios, treatments, risk appetite, exceptions, and governance decisions use the same evidence as security operations.
See moreControls, framework readiness, audit workspaces, evidence, and outward trust publishing stay connected.
See moreVendor records, ratings, assessments, posture context, and reassessment history move through one buyer-side workflow.
See moreManage incident lifecycle, control impact, regulatory reporting, crisis coordination, and lessons learned.
Who it is for
Shared operating data supports security, GRC, audit, vendor-risk, procurement, and executive decisions without fragmenting the platform story.
Connect exposure, remediation pressure, quantified risk, control effectiveness, readiness, and trust posture in one leadership view.
Explore the CISO viewMap controls, prepare audit workspaces, and work from evidence generated by operational activity.
Explore the GRC & Audit viewOperate attack surface, vulnerability prioritization, remediation, cloud posture, identity risk, and hardening from connected security data.
Explore the Security viewManage supplier records, posture context, assurance evidence, assessments, and reassessment history.
Explore the Vendor Risk / Procurement viewView quantified risk, readiness, control effectiveness, and trust posture without reconciling fragmented dashboards.
Explore the Executive Leadership viewIntegrations and collection
Bring in vulnerabilities, posture findings, tickets, and security signals from the tools you already run. Then layer native vulnerability and configuration collection where the platform should produce its own evidence.
Plugin integrations
Connectors already represented in the collectors layer.
Built-in OpenSCAP, kube-bench definitions, and Microsoft security baseline material.
Direct compliance and configuration evidence collected by the platform.
Audit-ready evidence from control execution, process reviews, and native collection workflows.
Expansion vision
Future-facing capabilities remain visible, but every status stays explicit so planned work is never presented as available.
Answer once and reuse approved responses and evidence across due-diligence requests.
A living directory of assessed vendors, posture signals, and assurance records.
A shared audit coordination workspace instead of email chains and static folders.
Next step
Choose the path that fits how you want to evaluate Ciso Cockpit.